Assessment of Selected Landrace and Improved Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Genotypes under Stressed and Non-stressed Conditions

Main Article Content

D. Oppong-Sekyere
B. B. Yintii
L. A. Akolgo

Abstract

Drought is one of the most essential and critical abiotic restraints to groundnut production and yields in the Northern Region of Ghana. A field experiment was conducted to assess selected landrace and improved groundnut genotypes for agronomic performance in the 2017 and 2018 minor seasons. Groundnut genotypes were treated under normal irrigation (W/W) and water-stressed (W/S) conditions. A Randomized Completely Block Design (RCBD) with four replications was adopted. Total experimental area was 23.4m x 2.4 m with a planting distance of 40 cm x 20 cm for both environments. Data collected include; days to 50% emergence and flowering, plant height at maturity (cm), growth appearance, days to maturity, number of pods/plot, number of seeds/plot, pod weight (g), seed weight (g), fresh and dry biomass weights (g), SPAD chlorophyll meter reading at 60 and 80 days after planting, harvest index (HI) and drought tolerance index (DTI). The data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using GenStat, version 12.0, Exploratory Analysis, descriptive Statistics (mean comparison of plant characteristics by varieties at 5% level using Tukey’s groups) was conducted; Correlation Analysis and Multivariate Analyses were performed using the Wilk’s Lambda to test for significant difference at 5% and 1% levels respectively. Means were separated using S.E.D. of means at 95% confidence level. Results from the growth features indicated a higher percentage of the groundnut varieties sprouted earlier under well-watered conditions. There was no significant difference among the groundnuts regarding the numbers of days to flowering. The groundnuts took approximately 104 days after planting to mature under both water conditions. Chlorophyll content and distribution in the groundnut leaves was high the well-watered plants. The chlorophyll content among the groundnut crops showed no significant difference between the chlorophyll content at 60-days after planting and 80-days after planting under the water-stressed condition. However, chlorophyll content of leaves at the 60-days after planting was 2.94 lower than that under 80 days after planting. Maturity and flowering (0.768), as well as plant height and seed yield (0.501) were highly significantly and highly positively correlated. The seed characteristics were also highly, significantly and positively correlated with the pod characteristics of the crop. The biomass measure also correlated with the pod and seed traits. Groundnuts genotypes under well-watered environment generally performed better in terms of yield than those under water-stressed environment.

Keywords:
Groundnut, drought, abiotic, production, landrace, improved, genotypes, chlorophyll

Article Details

How to Cite
Oppong-Sekyere, D., Yintii, B. B., & Akolgo, L. A. (2019). Assessment of Selected Landrace and Improved Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Genotypes under Stressed and Non-stressed Conditions. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 40(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2019/v40i130355
Section
Original Research Article

References

Waele D, Swanevelder CJ. Crop production in tropical Africa. Goikink Graphic nv. Belgium. 2001;747-753.

Tweneboah CK. Modern agriculture the tropics with special reference to Ghana Publisher-Cp – Wood. 2000;189-190.

Gregory WC, Gregory MP. Groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). In evolution of crop plants (ed.) simmonds. Longman, London. 1986;155-154.

FAOSTAT; 2010.
Available at: http://faostat.fao.org/
(Accessed on October 15, 2012).

FAOSTAT; 2015.
Available at: http://faostat.fao.org/
(Accessed on May, 04, 2013).

Thamaga-Chilja JM, Hendriks SL, Ortmann GF, Green M. Impact of maize storage on rural household food security in Northern Kwazulu-Natal. Journal of family Ecology and Consumer Science. 2004;32:8-15.

Shilling R. Groundnut. Macmillan Education Limited. London.2002;146.

Reddy TY, Reddy VR, Anbumozhi V. Physiological responses of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to drought stress and its amelioration: A critical review. Plant Growth Regul. 2003;41:75-88.

Solomon KF, Labuschagne MT. Expression of drought tolerance in F-I hybrids of a diallel cross of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var. durum L.). Cereal Research Communications vol. 2003;31(1):249-56.

Songsri P, Jogloy S, Kesmala T, Vorasoot N, Akkasaeng C, Patanothai A, Holbrook CC. Heritability of drought resistance traits and correlation of drought resistance and agronomic traits in peanut. Crop Sci. 2008a;48:245-253.

Graciano ESA, Nogueisra RJMC, Lima DRM, Pacheco CM, Santos RC. Crescimentoe capacida defotossintetica da cultivar de amendoim BR 1 sobcondicoes de salinidade. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental. 2011;115:794-800.

Williams EJ, Drexler JS. A non-destructive method for determining peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultural florunner pod maturity. Peanut Sci. 1981;8:134-141.

Girdthai TS, Jogloy C, Akkasaeng N, Vorasoot S, Wongkaew CC, Holbrook et al. Heritability of, and genotypic correlation between aflatoxin traits and physiological traits for drought tolerance under end of season drought in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Field Crops Research. 2010; 118:169-176.
Doi: 10.1016/j. fcr.2010.05.007.

Nautiyal PC, Bhanushali TB, Vijay Prakash. Performance of groundnut germplasm at high temperature during the reproductive phase in Rajasthan, India. Int. Arachis Newslett. 2002;22:18-22.

Nageswara RRC, Talwar HS, Wright GC. Rapid Assessment of specific leaf area and leaf N in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using chlorophyll meter. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 2001;189:175-182.

Arunyanark A, Jogloy S, Wongkaewb S, Akkasaenga C, Vorasoota N, Kesmalaa T, Patanothaia A. Heritability of aflatoxin resistance traits and correlation with drought tolerance traits in peanut. Field Crops Research. 2010;117:258-264.

Jadhay GS, Shinde B, Surya Wanshi MW. Comparative performance of groundnut genotypes under varying row spacing in post monsoon environment. J. Oilseed Res. 2000;17(1):70-76.

Acquaah G. Introduction to quantitative genetics. In: Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding. 2007;121-145.

Bindu-Madhava H, Sheshshayee MS, Shankar AG, Prasad TG, Udayakumar M. Use of SPAD chlorophyll meter to assess transpiration efficiency of peanut. Pages 3-9 in breeding of drought resistant groundnut: Proceedings of a collaborative review meeting. Hyderabad. India (Cruickshank AW, Rachaputi NC Wright GC and Nigam SN, eds). ACIAR Proceedings No. 2003;112.

Songsri P, Jogloy S, Holbrook CC, Kesmala T, Vorasoot N. Akkasaeng C, Patanothai A. Association of root, specific leaf area and SPAD chlorophyll meter reading to water use efficiency of peanut under different available soil water. Agricultural Water Management. 2009;96:790–798.

Nagaswara Rao RC, Wright GC. Stability of the relationship between specific leaf area and carbon isotopic discrimination across environments in peanut. Crop Science. 1994;34:98-103.

Patel DP, Munda GC, Islam M. Dry matter partitioning and yield performance of HPS groundnut. Crop Research. 2005;30(2):156-161.

Challinor AJ, Slingo JM, Wheeler TR, Craufurd PQ, Grimes DLF. Towards a combined seasonal weather and crop productivity forecasting system. Determination of the spatial correlation scale. J. Appl. Meteorol. 2003;42:175-192.

Shinde BM, Laware SL. Effect of drought stress on agronomic and yield contributing characters in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Asian Journal of Experimental Biological Science SP. 2010b;1:65-68.

Nautiyal PC, Ravindra V, Vasantha S, Joshi YC. Moisture stress and subsequent seed viability: Physiological and biochemical basis for viability differences in Spanish groundnut in response to soil moisture stress. Oliagineux. 1991;46(4):154-158.

Kaul JN. Response of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes to planting geometry under sub-tropical conditions. Indian Journal of Agriculture Science. 1999;69(6):458-460.

Kathirvelan P, Kalaiselvan P. Growth characters, physiological parameters, yield attributes and yield as influenced by the confectionary groundnut varieties and plant population. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Science. 2006;2(6):287-291.

Veeraputhiran R, Kandasamy OS, Chandrasekhar CN. Standardization of chlorophyll meter readings for summer irrigated hybrid cotton. Madras Agricultural Journal. 2001;88:144-146.

Paungbut D, Jogloy S, Kesmala T, Vorasoot N, Akkasaeng C, Patanothai A, Puppala P. Heritability of early season drought resistance traits and genotypic correlation of early season drought resistance and agronomic traits in peanut. J. Plant Breed. 2011;43(2):165-187.

Gaikpa SD, Akromah R, Asibuo JY, Nyadanu D. Studies on molecular variation in Commercially cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Using SSR markers. International Journal of Science and Technology. 2015;3(2):80-85.

Salasya BW, Mwangi D. Mwabu, Diallo A. Factors Influencing. Adoption of stress-tolerant maize hybrid (WH 502) in Western Kenya. Africa Journal of Agricultural Research. 2007;2(10):544-551.

Gouri V, Reddy DR, Rao SBSN, Rao AY. Thermal requirement of rabi groundnut in Southern Telangana Zone of Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Agrometeorology. 2005;7(1):90-94.

McCann J. (). Maize and Grace: Africa’s encounter with a new crop. Harvard University Press, New York. 2005;1500-200.

Dharanguttikar VM, Borkar VH. Physiological analysis of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Genotypes. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2014;4(1):1-9.

Sio-se MA, Ahmadi A, Poustini K, Mohammadi V. Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditions. Field Crop Res. 2006;98:222-229.

Golbashy M, Ebrahimi M, Khorasani SK, Choukan R. Evaluation of drought tolerance of some corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids in Iran. African Journal of Agriculture Research. 2010;5(19):2714-2719.

John K, Vasanthi RP, Venkateshwlu O, Sudhakar P. Genetic variability and correlation studies among F1s and parents in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Legume Res. 2005;28(4):262-267.

Singh TP, Deshmukh PS, Pramod K. Relationship between physiological traits in Chickpea under rainfed condition. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2008;13(4):411-413.

Antony. Groundnut Research in Indian (ed.) Basu MS, Singh NB. National Research Centre for Groundnut. ICAR, PBS, Junagadh, Gujarat; 2000.

Reddy PV, Asalatha M, Babitha A. Relationship of mineral ash and chlorophyll content wiyh transpiration efficiency in groundnut under different moisture regimes. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2000;5(1):59-63.

Kadam DE, Patil FB, Bhor TJ, Harer PN. Stability for dry pod yield and days to maturity in groundnut genotypes. J. Maharashtra- Agric. Uni. 2000;25(3):322-325.

Attarde DR, Surya Wanshi RT, Wadile SC. Response of groundnut varieties to time of sowing in kharif season. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 2001;26(3):250-251.

Vijayakumar S, Gururaj Sunkad, Somsekhar P. Promising varieties of groundnut for north eastern dry zone of Karnataka. Nation. Workshop on Seed Tech., February. 2003;6-7:60-62.

Ntare BR, Williams JH, Dougbedji F. Evaluation of groundnut genotypes for heat tolerance under field conditions in a Sahelian environment using a simple physiological model for yield. J. Agric. Sci. 2001;136:81-88.

Songsri P, Jogloy S, Kesmala T, Vorasoot N, Akkasaeng C, Patanothai A, Holbrook CC. Response of reproductive characters of drought resistant peanut genotypes to drought. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2008b;7:425-439.

Hamidou F, Ratnakumar P, Halilou O, Mponda O, Kapewa T, Monyo E, Fayef I, Ntare BR, Nigam SN, Upadhyaya HD, Vadez V. Selection of intermittent drought tolerant lines across years and locations in the reference collection of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Field Crop Res. 2012;1(26):189–199.