Main Article Content
Brazil is one of the largest producers of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) in the world. The State of Pará is responsible for 1.02% of the production of Orange in Brazil. Of this amount, the municipality of Capitão Poço is responsible for 57% of the total produced by the State. In view of this, it is evident that the model of current economic development imposes transformations in the way of life that entail serious problems of health to the worker, for example, the exposure of the workers to the pesticides in the field. With this, it is noticed that it is important to deal with the legislation of Agrochemicals because this is still little known by most citricultures in the municipality of Capitão Poço, leading them to non-compliance with the law. From this, the objective of the research was to observe the potentials and limitations regarding the distribution chain, acquisition and use of agrochemicals and knowledge of the laws in the citriculture Paraense. For the development of the work, questionnaires were applied (based on the Agrochemicals Law - Law No. 7,802 of July 11, 1989, and the Law of Packaging - Law No. 9.974 of June 6, 2000) in the community of Nova Colônia. It is concluded that the laws, besides not being known and consequently not fulfilled, make it difficult to supervise the specialized professionals, who, in turn, are few for the region. Another obstacle to compliance with legislation is to make the producer update certain concepts and teachings, which are no longer accepted.
FUNDECITRUS- Citriculture Defense Fund - Production of oranges from São Paulo is estimated at 286.14 million boxes. São Paulo: Technical Manual for Diseases and Pests; 2016.
IBGE- Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. Demographic Census. Rio de Janeiro; 2015.
CONAB- National Supply Company. Data query system; 2015.
Bombardi LM. Poisoning and death by pesticides in Brazil: The new version of oligopolized capitalism. São Paulo: NERA – Center for Studies, Research and Agrarian Reform Projects. Technical Bulletin; 2011.
Pessoa VM, Rigotto RM. Agribusiness: Generation of social inequalities, impacts on lifestyle and new health needs in rural workers. Brazilian Journal of Occupational Health. 2012;37(125):65-77.
MAPA- Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Supply. Legislation Consultation System; 2000.
Schwart G. Sustainable management of secondary forests: Potential species in northeastern Pará, Brazil. Amazon: Science; Development. 2007;3(5):125-147.
Teixeira LB, Oliveira RF De. Nutrient balance in poultry, agroecosystems and pastures in Northeastern Pará. Belém: Embrapa Eastern Amazon (Embrapa Eastern Amazon). Research Bulletin. 1999;10:1024.
Ribas PP, Matsumura ATS. The chemistry of pesticides: Impacts on health and the environment. Liberato Magazine. 2009;10(14):149-158.
Zorzetti J, Neves PMOJ, Santoro PH, Constanski KC. Knowledge about the safe use of pesticides by farmers in the mesoregion of Northern Central Paraná. Semina: Agricultural Sciences. 2014;35(4): 2415-2428.
Yamashita MGN, Santos JEG. Pesticides labels and package inserts: Typographic readability parameters. In: Paschoarelli LC, Menezes MS. (Org.). Design and Ergonomics: Technological aspects. São Paulo: UNESP Publisher, Academic Culture; 2009.
Fernandes VA, Silva LF, Mesquita TRR, Capettini LSA, Rodrigues ALP, Santos SL. Pesticide use in agriculture - Practice analysis in the city of Ibirité / MG. Scientia Plena. 2012;8(3):1-6.
Ávila RA, Resende DMLC, Resende ILC, Rezende GAA. Rural work and pesticides: Case study in the clean water stream microbasin, Campos Altos, Minas Gerais. Pesticides: Journal of Ecotoxicology and Environment. 2009;19(2):73-80.
Monqueiro PA, Inácio EM, Silva AC. Survey of pesticides and use of personal protective equipment among farmers in the area of macaws. Archives of the Biological Institute, São Paulo. 2009;76(1):135-139.