Performance Evaluation of Digger for Ginger Crop

Main Article Content

. Narender
Atul Kumar Shrivastava

Abstract

The ginger (Zingiber officinale) rhizome is harvested manually by different types of spade, fork or bullock drawn plow. These methods consume more time, cause drudgery, losses and low field capacity. Therefore a tractor drawn digger was evaluated for ginger crop. The performance parameters (exposed, cut, bruised and digging efficiency) of the digger were studied at 3 forward speeds and 3 blade angles. The performance of the digger was found satisfactory in respect of digging efficiency of 98.01%, and undug crop of 2.38 % at an average depth of operation of 15.75 cm. The damage was 1.98 per cent which was much low as compared to manual digging of ginger crop (9.73%). The machine takes 7.4 hours to dig one-hectare area of ginger crop with field efficiency of 87.82%.

Keywords:
Machine, performance, digging efficiency, digger, ginger crop

Article Details

How to Cite
Narender, ., & Shrivastava, A. K. (2021). Performance Evaluation of Digger for Ginger Crop. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 43(2), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2021/v43i230644
Section
Original Research Article

References

National Horticulture Board. 2017-18. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Government of India, Gurugram-122015 (Haryana).

Indian standards institution (I.S.I.) as set out in “IS: 2720 (Part-II): Methods of test for soils-Part-II Determination of Moisture Content.” Analysis of variance technique/programme by SPSS Statistical Software; 1964.

Shirwal S. Mani I, Sirohi NPS and Kumar A. Design and development of carrot harvester. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. 2015;46 (1):28-34.

Narender, Rani V, Kumar A, Mukesh S, Singh A. Performance evaluation of the tractor operated root crop digger for sandy loam soil of Haryana. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 2016;53(1): 9-15.

Katiwat T, Khommueng P. Design and development of a power-tiller mounted potato digger. AGRIS. 1994;1: 139-141.