Impact of Front Line Demonstrations on Mustard Productivity and Profitability in Shivpuri District of Madhya Pradesh, India

A. L. Basediya *

RVSKVV-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Shivpuri-473551, M.P., India.

M. K. Bhargava

RVSKVV-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Shivpuri-473551, M.P., India.

Puneet Kumar

RVSKVV-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Shivpuri-473551, M.P., India.

Y. P. Singh

Director of Extension Services, RVSKVV, Gwalior – 474002, M.P., India.

Rajesh Gupta

RVSKVV-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Mandsaur-458001, M.P., India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

The study was carried out during 2017-18 to assess the impact of Cluster Front Line Demonstrations (CFLDs) on production and productivity enhancement of mustard crops. RVSKVV, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Shivpuri conducted a total of 75 demonstrations in selected clusters with GPS locations over an area of 30 ha in district Shivpuri of Madhya Pradesh. The yield performance data and economics of demonstration and farmer’s practice plots were compiled and analyzed for calculation of gap analysis, costs and returns. The critical inputs were identified in existing production technology through personal interaction, group meetings and discussions with farmers and KVK Scientists team. The improved technologies consisting improved variety, soil testing, seed treatment mechanized sowing, integrated nutrient and weed management, and pest and disease management. The average yield of improved technology demonstrations and farmers' practices were recorded as 17.80 q/ha and 14.40q/ha respectively. Overall, the 19.10 per cent increase in yield was found in demonstration plots over check plots. The average of the technology gap, extension gap, technology index and additional return were found as 2.20q/ha, 3.40 q/ha, 11 percent and Rs.11420/ha respectively. An average net return ofRs.42140/ha was found in demonstration plots as compared to Rs.30720/ha in farmers' practices and an average B:C ratio of 2.65 and 2.28 were recorded in demonstrated and farmers practices plots respectively. The higher yield and returns in demonstrations indicated that production and productivity of mustard at farmer’s fields increased by adopting improved technologies. The results revealed that the CFLDs by interventions of scientific technologies gave positive effects on production and productivity in mustard crop cultivation.

Keywords: Mustard, CFLD, gap analysis, technology index, economic performance, B:C ratio


How to Cite

Basediya , A. L., M. K. Bhargava, Puneet Kumar, Y. P. Singh, and Rajesh Gupta. 2023. “Impact of Front Line Demonstrations on Mustard Productivity and Profitability in Shivpuri District of Madhya Pradesh, India”. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 45 (10):22-29. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2023/v45i102197.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ghintala Akshaya, Bheiru Singh, Mukesh Kumar Verma. Impact of front line demonstrations on mustard productivity in Hanumangarh District of Rajasthan, India. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2018; 7(09):1942-1946.

Choudhary BN. Krishi Vigyan Kendra- a guide for KVK mangers. Pub. Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR. 1999;73-78.

Samuei SK, Miha S, Roy DK, Mandal AK, Saha D. Evaluation of Frontline demonstration on groundnut. Journal of Indian Society Coastal Agril. Res. 2000;18: 180-183.

Yadav DB, Kamboj BK, Garg RB. Increasing the productivity and profitability of sunflower through front line demonstrations in irrigated agro-ecosystem of eastern Haryana. Journal of Agronomy. 2004;20:33-35.

Suryawanshi SD, Prakash M. Impact of viable technology of promoting oil seeds. Maharastra Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1993;48:420.94-95.

Hiremath SM, Nagaraju MV, Shashidhar KK. Impact of frontline demonstration on onion productivity in farmers field. Nation. Sem. Appropriate Extn. Strat. Manag. Rural Resources, Univ. Agric. Sci. Dharward. December. 2007;18-20:100.

Mishra DK, Paliwal DK, Tailor RS, Deshwal AK. Impact of Front line Demonstrations on yield enhancement of Potato. Indian Res. J. Ext. Edu. 9(3)26-28.

Dhaka, B. L., Meena, B. S. and Suwalka, R. L. (2010).Popularization of Improved Maize production technology through frontline demonstrations in south-eastern Rajasthan. Journal of Agri. Sci. 2009;1 (1):39-42.

Kumar A, Kumar R, Yadav VPS, Kumar R. Impact Assessment of Frontline Demonstrations of Bajara in Haryana State. Indian Res. J. Ext. Edu. 2010;10, (1):105-108.

Deshmukh G, Patel HB, Patel MR, Frontline Demonstration Influences on Knowledge and Adoption of Mustard Growers. Guj. J. Ext. Edu. 2014;25,(1): 27-30.

Singh SRK, Mishra A, Gautam US, Dwivedi AP, Prem Chand Scouting technological vis-à-vis extension gaps in soybean production in Madhya Pradesh. Ind. Res. J. of Ext. Edu. 2014;14(2):41-45.

Singh D, Impact of front line demonstrations on productivity of Carrot in Dholpur district of Eastern Rajasthan. Ind. J. Extn. Edu. &R.D. 2015;7(2&3):94-95.

Singh RK, Jaiswal RK, Kirar BS, Mishra PK. Performance of improved varieties of pulse crops at farmers’field in Kymore plateau and Satpura hills zone of Madhya Pradesh. Indian Journal of Extension Education. 2017;53(4):136-139.

Patel MM, Jhajharia AK, Khadda BS, Patil LM. Frontline demonstration: An effective communication approach for dissemination of sustainable cotton production technology. Ind. J. Extn. Edu. & R.D. 2013;21:60-62.

Singh DK, Gautam US, Singh RK, Study on yield gap and level of demonstrated crop production technology in Sagar district. Ind. Res. J. Extn. Edu. 2007;7 (2&3):94-95.

Hiremath SM, Nagaraju MV. Evaluation of frontline demonstration trails on onion in Haveri district of Karnataka. Karnataka J. of Agric. Sci. 2009;22(5): 1092-1093. https://mpkrishi.mp.gov.in

Lathwal OP. Evaluation of frontline demonstrations on black gram in irrigated agro ecosystem. Annals of Agril. Res. 2010;31(1&2): 24-27.

Singh jagmohan, dhillon bs. Asthaand parvinder singh). Front line demonstration – an effective tool for increasing the productivity of summer moong in amritsar district of punjab. Asian journal of soil science. 2012;7(2):315-318.