Marketing Pattern and Price Spread of Polyhouse and Open Field Cucumber Production in Jaipur District of Rajasthan, India

Sourabh Dadhich

Department of Agricultural Economics, SVPUAT, Meerut-250110 (U.P.), India.

Hubba Lal Singh *

Department of Agricultural Economics, SVPUAT, Meerut-250110 (U.P.), India.

Sakshi Yadav

Department of Agricultural Economics, SVPUAT, Meerut-250110 (U.P.), India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


In recent years, there has been concern about the effectiveness of marketing fruits and vegetables, which has resulted in high and volatile consumer price with only a minute portion of the consumer rupee flowing to the farmers. Horticultural crops are difficult to market because of their perishability, seasonality and bulkiness. Present study was an attempt to study the marketing channel and their efficiency. The Jaipur district of Rajasthan was selected purposively for the present study. A total of 26 intermediaries and 50 farmers were selected randomly. Among the total farmers, 25 growers producing cucumber in polyhouses and 25 in open field were selected randomly. The most common marketing channel engaged in marketing of polyhouse and open field cucumber in Jaipur district are following: Channel – I: Producer – Commission Agent – Wholesaler – Retailer – Consumer and Channel- II: Producer- Commission agent- Retailer- Consumer. Among both cucumber production system, in channel II the marketing cost incurred per quintal of cucumber was much lower than cost incurred in channel I. Since the marketing cost and marketing margin in channel I was higher, so the marketing efficiency was very low for that channel. At the same time in channel II was found to be lower price spread under both production systems. The most effective means of enhancing farmers' market access and reduce marketing cost through institutional means is by reinforcing cooperative societies, FPOs and shorten the marketing channel.

Keywords: Acharya approach, shepherd approach, marketing channel, price spread, marketing efficiency

How to Cite

Dadhich, S., Singh , H. L., & Yadav , S. (2024). Marketing Pattern and Price Spread of Polyhouse and Open Field Cucumber Production in Jaipur District of Rajasthan, India. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 46(5), 463–468.


Download data is not yet available.


Ramaulu M, Ramakrishna, Lalitha B. Agricultural marketing and inclusive growth in india what does the survey data suggest? The case of two villages in Medak district of Telangana state. American Journal of Business, Economics and Management. 2014;4(14): 34-41.

DhankarGH. Development of internet based agricultural marketing system in India. Agricultural Marketing-Delhi. 2003; 45(4): 7-15.

Economic Survey of India. Ministry of Finance, Economic Division. Government of India, New Delhi. 2021-22.

Anonymous. Third advance estimates, National Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture, Cooperation& Farmers Welfare, Government of India; 2021.

Lower RL, Edwards MD. Cucumber breeding In: M J Basset (ed.). Breeding vegetables crops. Westport, Connecticut USA: AVI Publishing Co. 1986;173- 203.

Kumar P, Mathur VC. Structural changes in the demand for food in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1996; 51(4): 664-773.

Kumar P. Food Demand and Supply Projections for India. Agricultural Economics Policy Paper 98-01. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi; 1998.

Acharya SS, Agarwal NI. Agricultural Marketing in India (Third Edition), Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi; 2001.

Bhandralia A, Arya R, Panda SN, Ahuja S. Polyhouse agricultural marketing system using big data hadoop. International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences. 2016;5(2):78-84 Available:

Mishra S, Singh R, Singh OP. Economic analysis of marketing of major vegetables in Varanasi district of Uttar Pradesh, India. Economic Affairs. 2014;59(4):649 Available:

Panda RK, Sreekumar. Marketing channel choice and marketing efficiency assessment in agribusiness. Journal of international food & agribusiness marketing.2012;24(3):213-230. Available: