In-Situ Measurement of Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity Function by Point Source Field Dripper Method Using Newly Developed Micro Irrigation Simulator for wheat Field

Mohd Tabish *

Department of Soil and Water Engg., JNKVV, Jabalpur, M.P., India.

A.K. Bajpai

Department of Soil and Water Engg., JNKVV, Jabalpur, M.P., India.

Chhedi Lal Verma

ICAR-CSSRI-Regional Research Station, Lucknow, India.

S.K. Pyasi

Department of Soil and Water Engg., JNKVV, Jabalpur, M.P., India.

R.B. Singh

Department of Soil and Water Engg., JNKVV, Jabalpur, M.P., India.

G.D. Deshmukh

College of Agricultural Engg, Balaghat, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity function (Kh) is an important soil parameter stating water transmission characteristics within the soil mass. It is essentially required in designing of drip irrigation systems. There are many laboratory and in-situ measurement techniques available for the measurement of Kh. These methods have associated limitations. Soil particle distribution curve had been also used for Kh estimation which is laborious and associated with own limitations. A point source field dripper model (PSFDM) using Wooding [1] theory was first time used by Shani et al. [2] for Kh measurement in the field. Experimental set up used earlier had great limitations of controlling dripper discharge by maintaining appropriate pressure in drip line. Hence an experimental set up (micro-irrigation simulator) was developed for in-situ measurement of Kh which simulates real field drip conditions. Experiments was conducted to measure steady state saturated fronts against 2.02, 4.04, 7.56 and 8.31 lph dripper discharges maintaining one atmospheric pressure in drip line in recently harvested wheat field. Inverse saturated radii (r-1) were plotted against water flux density q (cm hr-1).  Slope and intercept of the plotted line was worked out and Ks and α were calculated using steady state PSFD theory. Ks value was calculated as 50.03 cm/day and α as 0.1048 cm-1 using PSFD model of Shani et al. [2] and 60.00 cm/day and 0.0984 cm-1 using PSFD model of Warrick [3]. Ks value measured by using inverse auger hole method was 8.694 cm/day and by infiltrometer test 19.13 cm/day. The PSFDM is relatively new method and is useful for measuring Kh of tilled zone. Kh values are much higher than the values of Kh of untilled soil at deeper depths due to compaction. The developed experimental set up has great compatibility with PSFD theory. 

Keywords: Field dripper, sodic soil, unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, saturated front


How to Cite

Tabish, Mohd, A.K. Bajpai, Chhedi Lal Verma, S.K. Pyasi, R.B. Singh, and G.D. Deshmukh. 2024. “In-Situ Measurement of Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity Function by Point Source Field Dripper Method Using Newly Developed Micro Irrigation Simulator for Wheat Field”. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 46 (7):284-91. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i72583.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wooding RAA. Steady infiltration from a shallow circular pond. Water Resource. Res. 1968;4(6):1229-1273.

Shani U, Hanks RJ, Bresler E, Oliveria CAS. Field method for estimating hydraulic conductivity and matric potential water content relations. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 1987;51: 298-302.

Warrick AW. Point and line infiltration calculation of wetted soil surface. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 1985;49:1581-1584.

Richards LA. Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. Physics. 1931;1:318-33. (Referred from Philip, 1968).

Gardner WR. Some steady state solutions of the unsaturated moisture flow equation with application to evaporation from a water table. Soil Science. 1958;85:228-232.

van Genuchten MT. A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of un-saturated soils, Soil Science Society of American Journal. 1980;44:892–898.

Brooks RH, Corey AT. Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division ASCE (IR2). 1966;61-88.

Clapp RB, Hornberger GM. Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic properties. Water Resources Research. 1978;14:601-604.

Fredlund DG, Xing A, Huang S. Predicting the permeability function for unsaturated soil using the soil water characteristic curve. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 1994;31:533-546.

Singh SR, Verma CL. A drag resistance model with an empirical factor for estimating saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy. 2010;76: 189-199

Saxena CK, Gupta SK, Purohit RC, Bhakar SR. Salt water dynamics under point source of drip irrigation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2015;19:101-113.

Philip JR. Replay to “comments on steady infiltration for spherical cavities”. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 1985;49:788-789.

Elrick DE, Reynolds WD. Method for analyzing constant head well permeameter data. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 1992;56:320-323.

Singh SK. In situ determination of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity using subsurface emitter method. Ph D thesis, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand; 1999.

Singh HC, Shyam R, Lal C. Estimating soil hydraulic properties using field drippers. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 2001;49 (3):393–399.

Ojha RP, Verma CL, Denis DM. Estimating unsaturated hydraulic conductivity function of sodic and normal soils using point source field dripper method. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 2018;17: 34-40.

Warrick AW. Point and line infiltration--Calculation of the wetted soil surface, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1985;49:1581-1583.

Ojha RP, Verma CL, Denis DM, Arora S. Line-source field dripper for the measurement of in situ unsaturated hydraulic conductivity function. Current Science. 2020;118:1984-1990.

Warrick AW, Lomen DO, Yates SR. A generalized solution to infiltration, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. J. 1985;49:34-38.

Horn JWV. Determination of hydraulic conductivity with the increased auger hole and infiltration method. In Proceedings of the International Drainage Workshop, International Institute of Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 1979;25.

Saina NK, Mahmood SVM. Determination of Non-Eroding Discharge Based on the Threshold Velocity of Particle Motion and Soil Texture Triangle in Irrigation Furrows. Asian Res. J. Agric. [Internet]. 2022;15(4): 180-9.

[Aeeesson; cited 2024 May 18] Available:https://journalarja.com/index.php/ARJA/article/view/369

Phukan R, Sahewalla IP. Impact Assessment of Soil Parameters Affected by Gas Flaring in Tea Garden in Dibrugarh District of Assam, India. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. [Internet]. 2022;34(11):125-32.

[Aeeesson; 2024 May 18] Available:https://journalijpss.com/index.php/IJPSS/article/view/1743

Loosvelt L, Pauwels VR, Cornelis WM, De Lannoy GJ, Verhoest NE. Impact of soil hydraulic parameter uncertainty on soil moisture modeling. Water Resources Research. 2011; 47(3).